Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly

current issue
Volume 40 • Issue 4 • Summer 2013 • pages 677 to 1010

When One Is Not Enough, But Two Is a Company Union: A First Amendment Analysis of the National Labor Relations Board's Restrictions on Employee Involvement at the Nonunion Workplace
■ by Mark J. Mahoney

Restoring the Vote: Former Felons, International Law, and the Eighth Amendment
■ by John Ghaelian

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius: Five Takes
■ by Glenn H. Reynolds and Brandon P. Denning

Livelihood, Ability to Pay, and the Original Meaning of the Excessive Fines Clause
■ by Nicholas McLean

Note:
Quill's Call to Action: Will Congress Update Commerce Clause Nexus Requirements in Light of Cloud Computing?
■ by Molly Schneider

Note:
A Check-in on Privacy After United States v. Jones: Current Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence in the Context of Location-Based Applications and Services
■ by Kathryn Nobuko Horwath

Note:
Arizona v. Winn: Negative Implications for First Amendment Proponents and Possibly for Our Nation's Schoolchildren
■ by Adam Sloustcher

Note:
Public Disclosure and Moving the World Forward: Why We Need the America Invents Act
■ by Arman Matevosyan

SPOTLIGHTS

Audio and video of our 2013 Annual Symposium, Patent Pending, featuring the Honorable Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and co-sponsored by Morrison & Foerster LLP is now available! Click here.

HCLQ's Autonomy, Debate, and Corporate Speech by David Shelledy was cited by Justice Stevens in his opinion, dissenting in part and concurring in part, in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission for the proposition that at the time the First Amendment was ratified, all corporate activities were regarded as resting "entirely in a concession of the sovereign."

CONNECT

Over 900 articles on constitutional law are available in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly's free-to-access archives.